Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Should College Athletes Be Paid?

Sunday night after the NCAA Selection Show and Bracketology, ESPN aired it's newest documentary following their critically acclaimed 30 for 30 series titled "The Fab 5." The film chronicled the well-known Michigan teams of the early 90s that had five freshmen in the starting lineup. They started out as just hype but quickly became a force in the college basketball world, playing in two national title games. Despite losing them both they left their mark in college basketball by wearing baggy shorts, black shoes and black socks. Four of the five played in the NBA and the film was truly gripping, especially during the scene when Chris Webber called the timeout that cost the Wolverines the 1993 championship game. There are several times in the movie that the players mention that they should be paid. They are from rough backgrounds in Detroit and Chicago and don't have enough money at times to eat or fill their car with gas. This brings up the question in the long debate of should college athletes be paid?

Chris Webber walked by a store in Ann Arbor and saw a number 4 Michigan jersey hanging in the window for 75 dollars. Somebody was going to make 75 dollars of that jersey but he wasn't going to receive any of it. Nike was selling "Fab 5" shoes and socks but the Fab 5 wasn't getting a cut of that. Think about how you would feel if somebody was basically using you to make money. That's how these five individuals felt and many probably still do today. Hundreds if not thousands of people probably own a number 4 Duke jersey from a few years ago but J.J. Redick never saw any of that money. I used to say that college athletes shouldn't get paid because they should have to work their way to the big time in the pros but my stance has changed. I played college basketball this year so I know what the lifestyle is like a little bit. People say that these kids don't need to be paid because they will have millions of dollars thrown at them when they are older but they can't worry about that in college. They have to worry about the now.

Pay the athletes at least a small sum for their time. Factor in all the travel time and practice time and they give the university a ton of of their personal time. That cuts in to studies, eating and social time. They deserve something especially if they are being used like the Fab 5 were. If somebody is selling something with a person's name on it they should get a cut of that. That doesn't happen and it is unfair. Some of these guys won't make the NBA. Look at Jimmer Fredette. People are making money off of him like crazy and he's not getting any of that and he may not make it in the NBA. He will never have that money.

It's time to start paying these athletes because they invest loads of time and people use them to make money. They are basically professional athletes yet get nothing for their skills or time. College sports is not a hobby, it is a profession. Pay the kids something. Even if it is 30 dollars a week that is good enough for them to get some food and gas. Minimum wage may be too much money but anything is good for them. It's time to start paying up and it's been far too long.

3 comments:

  1. Good post. I played 3 years of college football so I know where your coming from. College athletes should be paid somewhere from 1000-3000 a year they play to compensate for the crazy work load every week and weekends that they have. It leaves no time to work and make spending money. The NCAA has even made it illegal for athletes to accept groceries from people. It is crazy and they need some kind of compensation for making the millions for the schools and the television networks and the NCAA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have to disagree with you on this one. Ask the other college students who end up in thousands of dollars in debt after they graduate if the scholarship athletes got paid. And after they have their books and classes paid for they receive room and board checks. This means they are given the same amount of money it would cost ( room and food) as it would if they were in the dorms. Dorms are one of the most expensive places to live. Athletes are given $800 dollar check a month, they live in a $400 appt = $400 in their pocket. Now this usually goes to groceries etc. You may know this already but a lot of people don't. Athletes do get money in their pockets, clothes, meals, free tutors, and other various advantages. So as far as money given to them by the school or from boosters I say no.

    However, your fab 5, or J.J. Redick example makes a great point. In lack of better words, players should have their jerseys "patented" while they are the ones wearing them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great article! It seems it's time college athletes should be paid. The NCAA has held down this racket for a long time. If they don't change, more than $2,000 per year, they're going to fall. The debate over at TC Huddle got me thinking about this. I wondered what other people were saying and found your opinion.

    Thanks for the post! Enjoyed it. Here's the article that led me here if you're curious: http://www.tchuddle.com/2011/07/pay-the-kid-the-earned-dollars-of-college-athletes/

    ReplyDelete