Bulls Sign Rondo, Wade In Bizarre Free Agency Moves

At some point in this millennium, signing Rajon Rondo and Dwyane Wade would have been any team's dream and perhaps put them as a frontrunner for best backcourt in the league. That would have been in 2008 or so, but it's 2016 and the Chicago Bulls just signed both players to sizable contracts. This comes on the heels of Gar Forman and John Paxson's stated goals of "getting younger and more athletic" moving forward.

How does a team get younger and more athletic you ask? I don't have all the answers, but probably not by signing 30-year-old Rondo and 34-year-old Wade. The main qualm from many is that the Bulls just signed up to get older, slower and lock themselves into more years of mediocrity, which is the worst place to be in basketball. Forman was reluctant to rebuild the Bulls, opting instead for a retool, which began with the Derrick Rose-to-New York trade. 

Bleacher Report

So the plan was a retool, but then on Draft night word was going around that the Bulls were also looking at trading Jimmy Butler, the other cornerstone of the Bulls who had assumed the face of the franchise role just a day before. Which was it? Retool or rebuild? It seemed a bit unclear. However, the Bulls hung on to Butler and drafted Denzel Valentine, returning a few good vibes to the team after trading Rose.

All signs pointed to the Bulls taking a pass on free agency this season and instead waiting for 2017 to (try) and woo some free agents to Chicago. And then news broke that Rondo was coming to Chicago and fans started scratching their heads. Sure, the guy could be blindfolded in the dark and still find the open man, but he could also tear a locker room apart, fight with his coach, refuse to play and demand a trade. Am I right, Dallas?

Rondo is not young and he's not necessarily athletic. He's joining a group of athletic freaks like Niko Mirotic and Doug McDermott. How does this fit in with GarPax's plan other than the fact that it doesn't?

A few days go by and Dwyane Wade signs with Chicago. If it was 2010 Bulls fans might be ecstatic, but again, it's 2016. Personally, I don't think it's a horrible move. Sure, Wade is older than the Bulls would like, but he averaged 19/4/4 last season and could potentially lure other free agents next season. As for right now, it at least shows the Bulls can sign a big name in free agency after years of failure to do so (James, Wade, Bosh, Anthony).

My take: neither signing is awful for the Bulls who have shown they do not want to rebuild. However, fans in Chicago have grown tired of Forman and Paxson and their poor track record in the front office. Perhaps if they had not stated that they wanted the Bulls to "get younger and more athletic" fans would be a bit more perceptive to the pair of signings. But "trust" and "GarPax" don't go together for Bulls fans unless they are saying they don't trust them.

Only time will tell whether or not the signings pay off, but even if the Bulls wallow in mediocrity for another season there will be no shortage of interesting headlines around this team. GarPax may not know what direction they want this team to go, but the direction is now clear: the Bulls have retooled the roster and may get the exact same results.

That's not something that will sit well with Chicago fans.